The bar chart compares the volume of male and female participating in different evening courses, namely drama, painting, sculpture, and language; while the pie chart shows the ages of these attendees.

Essay topics:

The bar chart compares the volume of male and female participating in different evening courses, namely drama, painting, sculpture, and language; while the pie chart shows the ages of these attendees.

The bar chart compares the volume of male and female participating in different evening courses, namely drama, painting, sculpture, and language; while the pie chart shows the ages of these attendees.
Overall, it is crystal clear that with the exception of sculpture, more women are attracted to enroll in the adult education center in 2009. Adult members and senior citizens accounted for the highest proportion of the participants, according to the pie chart.
Looking at the bar chart, 40 women attended a language course, which is two times of the men volume with 20. 30 and 20 female attended in painting and drama; however, the number is moderately lower for a male with the former made nearly 25 and the latter constituted 10. Conversely, the number of men attending sculpture is twofold of women with 10 and 5 respectively.
Regarding the bar chart, a meager percentage of juveniles and young people attended evening class in 2009 with 5% and 11% respectively. Nevertheless, senescent people percentage was almost three times more than the 30-39 age group with 42% and 16% respectively.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-23 Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani 89 view
Essays by user Mohammad Khale… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ees. Overall, it is crystal clear that with the exception of sculpture, more women are attracted to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, look, nevertheless, regarding, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11666666667 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87137318205 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605555555556 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5202289474 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401865869702 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182788760341 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.311696599938 0.0843802449381 369% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318623520329 0.15604864568 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.39342452358 0.0819641961636 480% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.