The table below gives information about a restaurant’s average sales in three different branches in 2016.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the statistics of a restaurant in three branches from different streets of Vancouver in 2016.
Overall, the branch on Georgia street has the highest figures for all of the categories. It is apparently the most common branch of the restaurant.
The number of transactions including take-away and eat-in ones was the highest among the three branches, being 584 per day. Dunsmuir street branch took the second place of the number of transaction, which is 750. However, customers tent to eat in were fewer than those who took away, by 34 transactions per day. The trend was reversed compared to the one in Georgia street.
In terms of transaction value, although the branch on Georgia street still had the highest averaged for $10.69 because of their most popular items, chicken burger, the one on Dunsmuir street was surprisingly the lowest, nearly half of the value on Georgia street, just $5.61. The Drake street branch has transaction value relatively high, being $9.02 with the signature items which is chicken pasta
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | Sharan Kaur | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the reported number of cases of influenza in people over 65 in a certain village in the UK from 1985 to 1995 76
- The table below gives information about a restaurant s average sales in three different branches in 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rgia street has the highest figures for all of the categories. It is apparently the most c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, second, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05847953216 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60451318614 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.9236139278 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1111111111 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0884833518487 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477909239958 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655280365429 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864493581903 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082517584852 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.