The diagram shows the skeletal systems of two ancestors of modern human beings.
The diagram illustrates the information through which the skeletal systems of two early types of human are compared. Overall, we can see that Australopithecus afarensis had a wider body and much longer arms than Homo erectus that was slimmer and had more functionally-developed joints of skeleton.
Beginning with the upper half of body part, Australopithecus afarensis, having a more unbalanced head with longer snout, had a much broader chest and waist than homo erectus, making it a more circular appearance. The former had much larger hands: the longer arms, higher and more narrow shoulders, which would have been useful for climbing trees.
Turning to the lower half of the body, we can see that Homo erectus had proportionately and longer-suited legs and larger hip, knee and ankle joints. Their feet were also smaller and more arched, with more enlarged heelbones and shorter toes, in comparison with the other one. These meant that this human type would be more appropriate suited to long-distance running.
To sum up, there are significant changes in the earlier humans development. The physical differences are clearly related to differences in the lifestyles of tree climbers and endurance runners.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
- The graphs below depict information about the Expenditure on Health and Education in the UAE (% of GDP) between 1985 and 1993, and also Infant Mortality and Life Expectancy from 1970 to 1992. 84
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry. 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagram shows the skeletal systems of two ancestors of modern human beings 86
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... are significant changes in the earlier humans development. The physical differences a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35416666667 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10381709441 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635416666667 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0382533135 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.222222222 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0830777778474 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486611150889 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992487249161 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.057897756176 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654661016903 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.