Today, it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace. Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.
Due to globalization and economic boom, office places are not only have diverse culture but also have huge age variation in the work force. There are plethora of merits and demerits because of this situation. I will discuss both aspects before forming any opinion at the end.
To embark on, economy of a nation no longer limited to its boundaries and so do the working areas. On one side of the coin, organizations are getting various advantages due to the cultural diversity and work force age difference. Firstly, top managements of every company are highly qualified aged people as they have acquired humongous experience in their tenure and they can predict the future of the organization. Secondly, mid and entry-level staffs of any company are young because to execute vision of an organization we need energetic, agile and active employees. Lastly, if youth and elderly employee are perfectly blend in an organization, the future of the company is better. Because, aged people will pass on their knowledge to younger generation, which may become senior leader in future. Moreover, the mistakes done by older leader will not be repeated by new generation if youths have a chance to work with elderly people.
On the other side of the coin, age difference may sometime develops few negatives in the organization. Firstly, thought process of youths and aged people are different. Young generation can think and execute any task at fast pace whereas aged employees are slow at execution. Secondly, if young people oppose the idea of top management, aged employees find it the difficult to digest even though they are wrong due to ego.
To recapitulate, although there is difference in thought process and execution between aged and youth employees, the numerous merits of having mix generation in work culture outweigh the demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-29 | shinashirazi | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | Tinatintin | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | jkataria | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | BIBHU KALITA | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | BIBHU KALITA | 67 | view |
- The internet allows us to stay connected with each other no matter where we are. On the other hand, it also isolates us and encourages people not to socialize.To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?Give reasons for your answer and i 67
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. 73
- Today many people do not realise how important the natural world is Why is this How can people learn more about the importance of the natural world 77
- “In the first four years that Montoya has served as mayor of the city of San Perdito, the population has decreased and the unemployment rate has increased. Two businesses have closed for each new business that has opened. Under Varro, who served as may 50
- Write a letter to invite your English-speaking friend to watch a new film with you about your country.In the letter, you should:•include some information about the film•explain why your friend might be interested to watch the film•inform other arran 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 624, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'blended', 'blent'.
Suggestion: blended; blent
...outh and elderly employee are perfectly blend in an organization, the future of the c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 791, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...eration, which may become senior leader in future. Moreover, the mistakes done by older l...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12956810631 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77421568521 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5420981958 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.097757528596 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340111853299 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252932610881 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.071173014589 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214645616331 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.