TPO29 writing
When it comes to the migration hypothesis, which is the theory of how edmontosaurs survived in the winter one hundred million years ago, the reading passage supports it with three reasons, which are contradicted by the following lecture.
First, the reading passage argues that edmontosaurs had to migrate to warmer place to find plants. The lecture, on the other hand, disapproves that it was much warmer on North Slope than today, with a lot of sunshine every day. Plants thrived actually, and what is more, there were still a huge amount of dead plants during winter, which could provide enough food for edmontosaurs to survive. As a result, this evidence can't prove that edmontosaurs used to migrate.
Furthermore, the reading passage proposes that edmontosaurs were migratory animals, because many skeleton fossils were discovered at the same place, which meat they lived in herd just like the modern migratory animals. However, the lecture counters that it doesn't mean that. Many modern animals live in herd for some other reasons, for instance, more protections from being attacked by predators, instead of migrating.
Last, the reading passage mentions physical capability to run can help edmontosaurs to migrate to some regions in long distances. But the lecture indicates that younger edmontosaurs weren't able to run fast, which may slow the speed of whole herd. Additionally, younger edmontosaurs couldn't survive own, and they couldn't be left behind the herd. So, physical running ability can't prove this theory, either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-25 | divingteng | 85 | view |
- TPO50 integration writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A person should never make an important decision alone.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- TPO29 writing 85
- West Egg’s landfill 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... to survive. As a result, this evidence cant prove that edmontosaurs used to migrate...
^^^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
.... However, the lecture counters that it doesnt mean that. Many modern animals live in ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...ure indicates that younger edmontosaurs werent able to run fast, which may slow the sp...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...erd. Additionally, younger edmontosaurs couldnt survive own, and they couldnt be left b...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ontosaurs couldnt survive own, and they couldnt be left behind the herd. So, physical r...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 375, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... the herd. So, physical running ability cant prove this theory, either.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, however, may, so, still, for instance, as a result, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34979423868 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66377555008 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641975308642 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2018392407 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374271629904 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120971800241 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648346133173 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218324257836 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029661018368 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.