The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph compares three different types of phone calls, namely local line, national and international line, and mobiles in terms of the amount of time spent by the people in the United Kingdom over the course of 8 years.
Overall, it is obvious that both local line and mobiles experienced an upward trend in the number of minutes for calling, throughout the period shown. While national and international line fluctuated but still remained the highest figures.
According to the chart, mobiles were the least using telephone in the UK. In 1995, it stood at considerably under 10 billion of minutes, compared to slightly below 40 billion of national or international phone calls. The figures for mobile's calling rose dramatically from under 10 billion to around 45 billion in 2002. Similarly, there was a considerable rise in the minute number of the national and international line with nearly 60 billion in the last year.
In comparison, a fluctuation was seen in the local line's calling minutes within 8 years. The figures grew slowly by 1999 then had a stable fall in the following years. The amount of time spent on the local line reached its peak at approximately 90 billion in 1999, which was at least 2 times higher than the others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-26 | nightowlirene | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- the chart show the amount of time that 10 to 15-years-olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on the games consoles on the average school day in the UK. 84
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 78
- the bar chart shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, still, then, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 937.175257732 112% => OK
No of words: 212.0 206.0 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92924528302 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71007294589 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 127.690721649 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580188679245 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 290.88556701 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.5556954833 44.8134815571 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 76.5299724578 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 16.8248392259 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 4.34317383033 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142840616327 0.216113520407 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634062788963 0.0766984524023 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049607618977 0.0603063233224 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077531943549 0.12726935374 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703100586829 0.0580467560999 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 8.37731958763 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 8.71597938144 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.