Detailed description of crimes on newspaper and TV can have bad consequences on society, so this kind of information should be banned in the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, with the rapid development of the social media, people are able to receive the latest news. Nonetheless, this change does not only bring benefits to our community. Detailed depiction of crimes provides some unnecessary information for society. Therefore, we should cut down the coverage of detailed crimes and broadcast other useful information instead.
To begin with, it is the unnecessary description of crimes that deprives of the attentions of many other important issues. The news media prefer to report news which might get more views, such as bank robbery or drug smuggle. However, this only causes a negative effect to the society. We should instead cover other issues, which are in dire need of public assistance. For instance, in this year’s mosque attack in New Zealand, many news channels focus on the process of the shooting attack. It would be more helpful to society if they discuss how can people offer help to those victims. Moreover, one of the most criticized part of detailed description of crimes is that it facilitates the growth of crime. It is a common belief that people incline to imitate that they see in the life, not to mention violence crimes on TV.
On the other hand, description of crimes on TV and newspaper serves as a good method for government to increase awareness among citizens about the prevention of crime. The idea lies in the fact that, the reason of most victims who are being scammed are due to the unfamiliarity with new means of fraud. If government can make use of news coverage to help people realize how to protect themselves, then it is possible to lower the decrease the crime rate of fraud. It should be also noted that government can teach people not only about protection but also reporting potential crime, such as drug smuggle. Consequently, if description on TV is being use in a positive way, it is the best approach for government to promote effectively.
In conclusion, I believe that we should ban those information that report detailed description of crimes on TV, unless they use this opportunity to assist government’s promotion about protection of crime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-01 | accompnaist00 | 73 | view |
- Detailed description of crimes on newspaper and TV can have bad consequences on society, so this kind of information should be banned in the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to use land for human needs than to use land for saving endangered animals. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to use land for human needs than to use land for saving endangered animals. 76
- TPO52IntegratedTask-Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring 3
- It is more important to keep your old friend than it is to make new friends. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...ar's mosque attack in New Zealand, many news channels focus on the process of t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much news', 'a good deal of news'.
Suggestion: much news; a good deal of news
...ar's mosque attack in New Zealand, many news channels focus on the process of the sh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ntly, if description on TV is being use in a positive way, it is the best approach for government...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...onclusion, I believe that we should ban those information that report detailed description of cri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01117318436 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81547064298 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527932960894 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7986481571 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259378823325 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821283257358 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547458998666 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178701134585 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275216977422 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.