People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
An individual faces a number of decision making opportunities in his day to day life. These decisions may be as simple as determining the color of the shirt to be worn or as complex as choosing the next firm to be acquired.it is difficult to measure precisely the outcome of a decision but we may fairly judge the degree of its success or failure.
There has been an interminable debate over the relevance of emotions in decision making. Some theorists vouch for a stoic demeanor for decision making while others cannot overestimate the importance of emotions in the same.
I believe that decision making based on emotions and justified with logic may not be as paradoxical as it sounds. There are certain situations where a person cannot do away with a completely objective attitude. Moreover, if an individual is able to 'justify' or even apply logic to an emotional decision, it reflects that the decision maker has the power of reasoning and has come to a conclusion only after exploring the issue from all possible angles.Most of the issues faced in life, whether personal or professional, involve emotions to a certain extent. Sheer negliegence of emotions where humans are involved is possible only in a perfectly utopian world!
There might be instances where the juxtaposition of emotions and logic may lead to undesirable consequences. Consider an example where a white collar business professional acquires a dying factory in order to save the owner from financial distress who happens to be his son-in-law. No financial lesson of 'cheap deal' or 'portfolio expansion' may justify the emotional decision taken by the professional. Thus, it is extremely important to measure the composition of emotions and logic while making any major decision.
it can be said comprehensively that the conditions and the environment of decision making is a more appropriate parameter to deem a decision maker 'poor' or 'effective'.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 25
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 452, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Most
...ring the issue from all possible angles.Most of the issues faced in life, whether pe...
^^^^
Line 7, column 634, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('perfectly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('utopian') instead of another adjective.
...humans are involved is possible only in a perfectly utopian world! There might be instances wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...c while making any major decision. it can be said comprehensively that the co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 315.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14920634921 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04324421448 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.090771816 60.3974514979 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.166666667 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383061735804 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154647418744 0.0831039109588 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103453116199 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220513254388 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385050840377 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.