The bar chart illustrated the percentage of government expenditure on road and transport of Italia, Portugal, the United Kingdom and the USA over a period of 15 years (from 1990 to 2005). Overall, the road and transport in Italia and Portugal were invested with a larger portion of government spending compared to those in the UK or the USA. Specifically, Italia and Portugal spent approximately 20% or more of their budgets on this sector in the 4 years that data were collected. On the other hand, the spending of the UK and the USA on road and transport remained below 15% of their total expense.
In 1990, Portugal disbursed 27% of its total spending on road and transport, however, the figure shows that this sector gradually attracted less attention from the Portuguese government in the following years. In 2005, only 20% of Portugal’s total spending was on road and transport, which was a 7% drop from 1990.
For Italia, the graph does not show a clear increase or decrease in the percentage of government spending on road and transport. Its investment in this sector was around 20% from 1990 to 2005, with an exception in the year 2000, in which, nearly one-fourth of its budget was for upgrading roads and public transport.
Road and transport in the UK seemed to receive the least attention among the 4 countries. Approximately 10% of the government spending was allocated for this sector each year from 1990 to 2005. In 2000, a slight increase in the percentage was observed, marking the only year that its spending on road and transport was more than 10%. However, the data collected in 2005 demonstrated that spending for the same sector was lessened to 7.5%, which is the lowest from 1990.
For the US, a clear upward trend can be observed. Its government expenditures on road and transport were recorded to be approximately 10% in 1990 and 1995. In the next 10 years, the percentage went up constantly and peaked at 15% in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p constantly and peaked at 15% in 2005.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 965.302439024 168% => OK
No of words: 336.0 196.424390244 171% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83928571429 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78525637262 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 283.868780488 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3711654819 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53333333333 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444231680781 0.215688989381 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165883275558 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886344205791 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266191988652 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464966289244 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.