Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Before tendering my opinion I think it crucial to take quick glance on this argument on both sides. Many people agree that the government has to spend money for getting improved the internet access. But others believe that spend money by the government to improve the public transportation is more important. In my perspective I concur with the first group of people whose deal with spending money from the government to get better internet access is a good concept to do. Because of numerous reasons why I subscribe this attitude to elaborate cogently in the subsequent paragraphs.
First reason coming to my mind to consolidate my standpoint is nowadays we have un-limited kind of technology nationwide and that considered our countries become the best. Moreover, Internet access is one of the most essential aspect of these different kind of technology. Furthermore, plethora of people in this era seeking for better internet access everywhere in this world. Internet access helping people to find what they looking for it in just one finger press. For instance, that may raise their fundamental knowledge, critical thinking, and intellectual capacity as well.
Second reason I need to give it some attention is that communication between people is one of the most effective way to build many relations. For example, with good internet access people will be more socialized and friendly in general. So, the government should allocate funds to improve the internet access and this will lead people to communicate together in any time instead of wasting the government money by spending on public transpiration.
Additionally, internet access will allow people to improve their educational and economical level as well. Not only for the adult but the students also. They can build their future with a lot of thieves and prosperities. Students can achieve their goals and looking for their interested carrier by using internet if the government improved the internet access. Many studies claimed that government has to spend money on something considered the most necessary for the people. And that will impact people life in such a good way.
To but it in brief, I strongly agree that the government has to allocate some funds to improve the internet access instead of spending money to improve the public transportation. Many studies claimed that when the people talk to each other every day by phone or even chatting, that will give them a lot of energy, encourage, and support to get every thing done exactly as perfect. In a nutshell, in fact, there are multiplicity of other factors supplementing the aforementioned statements, which could be alluded here, but are not embraced due to the dearth of time
- 题目原文：Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few 83
- the widespread use of internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today's world 80
- tpo5 3
- tpo 39-integrated writting 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Improving transportation is the best way for governments to promote economic growth. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...Not only for the adult but the students also. They can build their future with a lot...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in brief, in fact, in general, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14898419865 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83034152996 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489841986456 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7802716302 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.681818182 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1363636364 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04545454545 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339131149965 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109451766293 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109576501587 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204937727978 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675853501342 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.