Maps show the changes of the lakeside (2000 – 2009).
The maps illustrate the alterations in the lakeside from 2000 to 2009. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the number of residential area and the size of the lake between 2000 and 2009.
To begin with the north of the river, there were a new car park, new offices and new university which replaced the position of derelict warehouses and old town in 2000. Multi-screen, furthermore, was built in the south part of residential area, specifically in the west of the new schools in which to the south of multi-screen cinema, there was a shopping centre which had been constructed in the place of residential area in previous time. In contrast, residential area, which was in the north side of arts centre, remained unchanged over the whole period.
In accordance with south part of the river, the existence of new industrial complex had been extended to the south part of the lakeside and replaced the place of residential area in 2000. To the north of new industrial complex, 2000 to 2009 witnessed a considerable change for the size of the lake in which it became smaller in 2009.
- MIX : The Pie chart and bar chart shows some data which concerned on arrest number 73
- People live longer today ,and therefore they should work longer? to what extent do you agree or disagree?? 67
- Process : Life cycle of the silkworm. 78
- The maps show the changes of Springfield primary school in 2005 2015 87
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77948717949 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76763486778 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8061503683 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.142857143 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224869854043 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144896177261 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151056751679 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214248383983 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153996745269 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.