Integrated
In this set of materials the lecture and reading passage argue about the inaccuracy of voting systems. There is mentioned a new kind of system with computers. The lecturer effectively casts doubt on the claims made in the article.
First of all, the author states that the voting people may accidentally vote for wrong candidate. Moreover, people with poor eyesight may find it difficult to vote and make some mistakes. The professor, on the other hand rebuts this argument. She posits that only the ones who are used to computers, this task will be easy but the ones who do not know how to use it, voting will be a trouble.
Furthermore, the passage suggests that it is inevitable that people will not make mistakes while counting and computers would do it better and more quickly. The lecturer opposes the claim. She believes that computers are more likely to make mistakes and the “the human errors” will show up in the programs.
Finally, the text notes that it would be risky to use the complicated voting system nationwide. The government and individuals, however, use computers for accurate banking transactions. The professor argues that voting happens just once or twice in US and it would not be trust-worthy to use this kind of voting system.
- Computers are being used more and more in education. Some people say that this is a positive trend while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- Integrated 3
- The given chart 67
- You are planning to study abroad. What do you think you will like and dislike about this experience? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 60
- Some people say that parents should places restrictions on the hours their children spend watching TV and playing computer games and encourage them to spend this time reading books instead Do you agree or disagree 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92990654206 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67955920962 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570093457944 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3423888974 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1538461538 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4615384615 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.