Nowadays, the future of a nation is contributed by many factors and one of the most important combiners is education. Thus, the statement claims that the governments should offer a free university education for those who have been admitted to a university but they could not afford the fee. Although at first glance it sounds logically convincing, I firmly believe that it is not entirely the government's responsibility.
On the one hand, the idea about offering a waiver is indeed a noble one and it would encourage students belonging to all economic strata to pursue higher education. However, it would be a burden for government and society, especially in the poor or undeveloped country when they need to allocate the limit budget for many country 's affairs such as health, food, safety, etc. For example, some countries in Africa, they are now trying to face with many urgent problems such as drought, the lack of food and water or many health issues, etc these are their top priorities. Moreover, the university has many economic sources such as from the private foundation, study promotion fund, etc and they could help their students who have academic qualifications and could not pay for the fee study. For example, in 2018 New York University have announced that they will free for every medical student. It proves that the university is capable enough to pay for students' tuition cost without too much support from the government. Besides, the government could give for the underprivileged students' loans without interesting rate and they just have to return when they have a job after graduation.
On the other hand, some argue that an investment in knowledge pays the best interest. Thus, the government should consider the grant for capable students in universities is making to build the society of the future. Moreover, offering free education to the deserving but downtrodden students would help them secure jobs that are well paying, thereby increasing the income of their family. A child from a family of daily wage workers, If offered such opportunities might study and become an engineer or lawyer, and earn many times the money that his parents ever earned. This could help in gradually bridging the gap between the rich and the poor in society.
In conclusion, offering free education to the deserving is an ideal policy for the students who come from the lower level in society could bring benefits for both society and individual students. However, it would be a heavy burden for a nation and society when there are many issues need to be prioritized. From my perspective, I think this if we want this idea becomes true, It has to assemble many sources from society not only from governments.
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- "A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the posi 58
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numb 69
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situ 29
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...mly believe that it is not entirely the governments responsibility. On the one hand, the i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood and water or many health issues, etc these are their top priorities. Moreove...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2266.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98021978022 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7095701352 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520879120879 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2987301825 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.888888889 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2777777778 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20929953857 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735104381639 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870096562697 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144570356284 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549824290252 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.