the significance of art education
From senators voting in the parliaments to old woman advertising products in small retailers, people living in the contemporary world may have to address public speeches from time to time. As a result, some experts suggest that universities should make public speaking a compulsory course. From my perspective, such suggestion is not reasonable as students are already extremely occupied with their major and public speaking skills are only useful to certain groups.
One major reason for my propensity is that students do not have spare time to study public speaking. Take every university student as an example, they bear extraordinary burden under their current schedule. It is very common for students to spend over five hours attending lectures and reading or writing for three more hours when they go back to the dormitory. What it more, when it comes to exam weeks, a fair amount of students will choose to stay overnight in the library in order to perform well in their exams. Provided that an extra compulsory course is added, students are likely to be overwhelmed. In other words, they may not have enough time to satisfy their basic needs, such as having a proper rest or entertainment. Therefore, the course shall not be added.
However, some people may argue that the university can balance the courses by reducing the time required to finish them. Admittedly, such approach can relieve the student's possible pressure, but it fails to take the essence of study into account. The quality of the given courses shall take priority rather than the quantity. If universities decide to reduce the time needed to accomplish one lesson, the lesson's initial goal and outcome will surely be damaged, which means the limited time is still a problem that people cannot solve.
Another significant reason is that public speaking is not essential for every student. Even in areas that the public believe speaking techniques are crucial, exceptions can exist. For example, people tend to believe that lawyers must be eloquent to sell their opinions to the judges or their clients. On the contrary, many lawyers are not involved in such business. Lawyers that conduct non-contentious affairs deal with legal documents and draft solutions for conflicts without rendering cogent arguments publicly. Compared with taking a public speaking course, it is undoubtedly more reasonable for students in such field to emphasis on their legal writing abilities. Similarly, it is not necessary to force students with other majors to participate in a public speaking course.
In conclusion, students nowadays are busy with their study. Thus, the school should consider putting priority in things that a students need most while trying to relieve their burden, instead of making it worse.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-14 | curiousnoob | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-14 | curiousnoob | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | Shan_1 | 61 | view |
| 2018-09-03 | dami_singh | 53 | view |
- Social media is a good way to express personal views 87
- Public speaking course should be mandatory in college 90
- the significance of art education 73
- For the successful development of a country, the government should focus its budget on young children's education rather than on universities. 83
- Honest is the important quality in choosing a leader 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lls are only useful to certain groups. One major reason for my propensity is th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 126, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...onsider putting priority in things that a students need most while trying to relieve their...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, similarly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 448.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63971821316 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549107142857 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5939049628 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.565217391 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4782608696 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78260869565 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0105227262598 0.244688304435 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00476706899281 0.084324248473 6% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.022359535532 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00511225315982 0.151304729494 3% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102245063196 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.