University students always focus on one special subject, but some people think universities should encourage students to study a wide spectrum of subjects. To what extent you agree or disagree?
Going to university has become a part of every adult's educational life to succeed in his/her future career. There is a group of people who believe universities have to change their policy and offer a wide range of subjects instead of focusing on specific ones. I hold the view that the universities' curriculum ought to be flexible based on in which year the student is.
Presenting different categories of subjects to the students could enrich their general skills and information. For example, courses such as art or computer science for law students would broaden their horizons, as well as give them the chance to discover their unrecognized talents and interests. Furthermore, this extra knowledge provides students with flexibility that is beneficial in the job market. Take a mechanical engineer with an outstanding ability in graphic designing as an example; he probably has a better chance of promotion prospects.
On the other hand, occupations have become more specialized in recent years, therefore students need to put their occupational concentrations on a specific subject. The job market has evolved into a competitive environment where whoever has the most comprehensive knowledge and expertise would be successful. computer science students, as an example, have to focus on only one professional subcategory to enrich their skills and capabilities. Otherwise, there is little chance of going through their desirable career.
In my opinion, whether to focus on a specific subject or not depends on which year the students are. Fresh students of first or second years could benefit learning a variety of courses, whereas junior and senior students should apply themselves to their specialized field because they have to be ready to seek for their desired job.
In conclusion, the complexity and competitiveness of the job market require both specialization and a wide spectrum of knowledge. Therefore, it is crucial that universities change their approach based on learners' grades and situations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-16 | nsham2004s | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
...specific ones. I hold the view that the universities curriculum ought to be flexible based o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Computer
...edge and expertise would be successful. computer science students, as an example, have t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43174603175 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06945878348 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584126984127 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.146850751 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.066666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217515554628 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737423860257 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492329227428 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128761943958 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484573458234 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.