The development of transportation has made significant improvements in the way that we live. Distances have been shortened due high advances in infrastructure and technology. Being able to live far apart from your beloved one was nearly impossible in past decades; however, nowadays couples can live long miles apart because of the reducing in time when traveling. Personally, I believe that the two major gains with improvement of freighting and transportation systems were the possibility to buy groceries online and the reduction in time in travel.
In the past groceries shopping could take a long time. Most of the working population can only buy groceries on the weekend, resulting in long lines at the cashier. In recent years, there have been a vast improvement in the ways we buy food. Venture capital asset funds injected money in startups with their promise to sell and delivery consumer goods at the same day. At the comfort of your home you can buy your daily dairy and rest assure that they will be delivery at the same day. These companies are using drones to freight our shopping as fast as they can, letting us enjoy our weekends and not spending our time waiting in lines. It is easy, practical and people are loving this convenience.
Another way that the improvement in transportation systems have changed the way we live, in a better way, was the reduction in time between cities. Couples are able to live far apart in distance wise; however, in a relative short time bound. For instance, me and my wife are working in different cities. We are living apart hundred miles away, but we can see each other within an hour drive. If you would travel this same distance fifty years ago or more, it would probably take several hours due the poor road conditions. Husband and wife would not want to live apart, then job search would be a more challenging task. On the contrary, we can be extremely flexible when applying for jobs because of the facility that transportation become.
In summary, improvement in shipping and the development of better vehicles, made our lives much easier. We are able to buy our food at the comfort of our homes without having to wait in line buying groceries. Moreover, even though we need to live apart from our loved ones, with good transportation it is not a hard task.
- When schools do not have enough funding or teachers, some people think physical education classes should be cut, while others believe that courses in art and music should be eliminated first. Which do you think is preferable, and why? 73
- Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 70
- Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 70
- Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 90
- Financial plan 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...lines. It is easy, practical and people are loving this convenience. Another way that ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, then, apart from, for instance, in summary, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8225 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68371826949 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5475 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9959055369 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8571428571 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0476190476 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147557316498 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497340354616 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757030732634 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106459862604 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652972666014 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.