The line chart reveals how much water was used for agriculture, industries, and homes globally from 1900 to 2000. The bar chart depicts water utilization in Brazil and Congo in 2000.
Overall, the demand for water, in the given sectors increased steadily over the century. While the highest amount of water was used for crops, homes consumed the least. However, Brazil showed a greater consumption of water than that of the Congo.
In 1900, almost 500km3 was used for farming and it steadily increased to approximately 1000km3 in 1950. After that, the agriculture use of water significantly went up, hitting the highest point of nearly 3000km3 in 2000. In contrast, Industrial and domestic use of water stood at 100km3 initially and it remained almost the same till 1950. From 1950 to 2000, industrial use inclined dramatically to nearly 1000km3, being the second highest, and at the homes, it rose slightly to 500km3.
On the other hand, Brazil with 176 million population and 26500km2 are of irrigated land used 359km3 water individually, whereas the Congo had only 5.2 million citizens and 100km3 land for irrigation and it utilized only 8km3 of water, which is far less than that of Brazil.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilization in Brazil and Congo in 2000. Overall, the demand for water, in the gi...
^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... up, hitting the highest point of nearly 3000km3 in 2000. In contrast, Industrial...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04020100503 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56961360283 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582914572864 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.5438767684 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.3 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190294250207 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890878316587 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327352077865 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125838620294 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323350829655 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.