The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The figure elucidates the several nations of overseas students’ residence in Australia between 1982 and 2000. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the amount of Singapore students in comparison with other states.
To begin with, there was a dramatic upsurge for the amount of India and Hongkong students’ residence from 1982, which made up at well below a tenth of 100 for both countries, to 2000, which constituted approximately at 55 for India and well beyond a half of 40 for Hongkong. Following the same pattern as India and Hongkong, Malaysia, initially, experienced a tremendous growth for their students’ residence in Australia in the following 4 years where it achieved at just beneath two-thirds of 30 and it palpitated sharply to two-sixths of 60 by the end of the period shown.
In contrast, 1982 to 2000 witnessed an enormous fluctuation for the total of Singapore students’ residence. Initially, it stood roughly at well under 3 and terminated to 10 in 2000.
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and more and more countries open their door and with more and more tourists.Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages? 67
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
- Bar Chart : the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 73
- Maps show the changes of the lakeside 2000 2009 85
- Line graph : car exports in three regions from 2013 to 2017. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, third, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17857142857 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18209186178 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.0599543241 43.030603864 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.0 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112737823787 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631080163571 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048176400704 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083450100245 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499168676983 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.