Some people think that the excessive use of smart phones badly affects teenagers’ literacy skills
In the light of the proliferation of technology, It is widely acknowledged that smart phones have permeated every aspect of people‘s lives. However, the frequency of using smartphones is still a topic that arouses much controversy. Some people believe that the capacity of writing and reading has been effected negetively by the over usage. While this may true to some extent, I would argue that adolescents competencies are not harmed.
The main purpose of using smartphones for younger generation is entertaining which is deteriorating teenagers’ literacy. Nowadays, adolescents use smartphone as a tool to keep in touch with their peers. By using informal English continuously, it has marginalized the formal form of writing. In a broader scale, people who are addicted to social media will spend a copious amount of time on their smartphones wasting their time to surf webs. This is a testament to the effects of smartphones.
I off the opinion that smartphones do not deteriorate adolescent competencies. It is no doubt that smartphones have revolutionized the way people access internet sources. In addition, students can read a thousand of formal articles online, which they can acquire knowledge about writing and reading, instead of buying newspaper from newsstand. The diversity of internet sources will go a long way with student’s literacy, creativity will be boosted. Furthermore, program developers created websites correcting student writing in a formal way. This is irrefutable the advantages of smartphones to student literacy.
In conclusion, while there are many reasons why smartphones affect student literacy, I believe that student competencies will be more beneficial of using it.
- The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems? 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technologyIn what ways has technology affected the types of relationships pp make?Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think that the excessive use of smart phones badly affects teenagers’ literacy skills 78
- The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 532, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a formal way" with adverb for "formal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ted websites correcting student writing in a formal way. This is irrefutable the advantages of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es of smartphones to student literacy. In conclusion, while there are many reas...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60076045627 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27659597638 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608365019011 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1653056672 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157609735926 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481750635271 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485704488846 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100321472461 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618069500618 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.