The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrient, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrient, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

The pie charts give some information about of three nutrients that they are eaten in the USA and they can be harmful if one eats them much.

In the first, we can see, nearly half of the sodium is consumed for dinner while 29% of it is eaten for lunch. Using sodium in breakfast and snacks are the same. Their proportion is 14%.

In the second, likewise sodium, consuming the saturated fat for dinner is the most. It is 37%. saturated fat proportion is just over a quarter for lunch and proportions for snacks and breakfast are respectively 21% and 16%.

In the third, The most added sugar exists at snacks (42%) and just under a quarter is for lunch (23%). The proportions of lunch and breakfast are nearly the same, they are respectively 19% and 16%.

To sum up, according to the charts, the unhealthiest meals are dinner and snacks because there are the most harmful nutrients on them, otherwise, lunch and breakfast are the healthiest meals.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-26 AydaShah 11 view
Essays by user AydaShah :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Saturated
... fat for dinner is the most. It is 37%. saturated fat proportion is just over a quarter f...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, second, so, third, while, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67261904762 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48925553943 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.8248010126 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0771859867305 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0273727310222 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556339275694 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0534894942631 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689982168761 0.0819641961636 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.4 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.