The line graph illustrates how much oil had been produced and used by people in China from 1982 to 2006.
In first glance, it was noticeable that from 1982 to 1993, the oil demand by Chinese was lower than the production, which was below 3 million of oil barrels per day. However, since 1990, the consumption of oil had risen dramatically. It had met the same amount of oil production, which was 3 million, approximately in year 1993. Furthermore, the oil demand from citizens in China was higher year by year.
Oil production, on the other hand, had reached a peak to only 3 million in 1986, and started to surge slowly again from 1994. In a 13-year period started from 1993, it had increased from 3 million to 3.5 million.
To sum up, oil production was more than oil consumption, and had a huge different in the last year, which was 2.6 million.
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 67
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments, or even criticism their teachers. Other think it will lead to loss of respect and displine in the classroom. Discuss both views and give 56
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, somecertain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extentdo you agree or disagree? 73
- The table below gives information on internet use in six categories by age group 89
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om 1993, it had increased from 3 million to 3.5 million. To sum up, oil produc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 704.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57142857143 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61426345627 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551948051948 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7465859386 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211290488932 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106185836597 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08740132783 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150521756974 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103258103434 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.