Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems. Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment, while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It seems like an irresistible tendency that people already pay attention to more and more environmental problems brought by science and technology. Some of them suggest that the only way to protect the environment is living with a traditional way, while others think that this trend also could help to release this problems.
Science and technology have a positive impact on building a positive view on environment. To begin with, they could impart knowledge about protecting environment on people widely. For instance, media improve public environmental awareness by various electrical devices such as smartphones and computers. Therefore, only a small change that people know from them could help our planet extremely. Furthermore, it is more efficient to take strong and harsh measures than before. This lies in the fact that there are heaps of methods to stop the deterioration of endangered species like building wildlife conservation areas. Ecological and nature resources conservation cannot be promoted radically without modern technologies.
On the other hand, a few technologies and scientific theories damage our living environment in some extents. For example, indeed, the gas emission exhausted by cars ruin the environment with serious air and water pollution. As a result, they would pose a threat to people’s health directly. However, this kind of problem could turn up with huge population. Some people’s bad behaviors could lead to increase the emission of carbon dioxide which is similar with the gas emission. If technology could help to teach people how to live eco-friendly, this problem must be solved by people’s efforts.
In conclusion, it is undoubted that science and technology help people to adopt nature and not transform or even destroy nature. People need to learn how to live with nature through modern science and technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-09 | lovepreet000 | 64 | view |
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems. Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment, while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems. Discuss both views and 73
- In modern societies, it is possible for people to go shopping, work and communicate via the internet without face-to-face communication. Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 84
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development overweight the disadvantages? 67
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor-bike. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t this trend also could help to release this problems. Science and technology hav...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48109965636 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00597532015 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604810996564 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9601802743 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.8235294118 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35294117647 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245805513292 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712146932122 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742288626482 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154322068159 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499503569667 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.