The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus, or train between 1970 and 2030.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph compares figures for daily travel of workers in the UK using the three different forms of transport (car, bus and train) during over the 60 years from 1970 to 2030. Units are measured by millions.
Overall, the car is the most popular means of transport for UK commuters travel throughout the period shown. Meanwhile, a great number of people use car and train grow gradually, the number of bus users decrease steadily.
In 1970, approximately 5 million of UK commuters drove the car on a daily basis, while the bus and train were used by about 4 million and 2 million people respectively. In the year 2000, the number of car users rose dramatically to around 7 million people. Likewise, the number of commuting rail passengers increased gradually to 3 million people after remaining stable during the 10-year period. However, there was a slight drop of approximately 0.5 million people using the bus.
By 2030, it is predicted the number of people driving the car to work will reach almost 9 million, and the train users also rise. By contrast, buses are predicted to become the less popular choice, with only under 3 million daily users.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-06-03 | huynhtien2407 | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus, or train between 1970 and 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of spreads from 1981 to 2007. 73
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 61
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84924623116 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5738063602 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582914572864 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5191312839 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187383881105 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786793277453 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561977406749 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128742828235 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426389962738 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.