The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given table demonstrates information about poverty families’ proportion in six different types with total households in Australia in 1999. Overall, it could be clearly seen that about 1837 thousand Australian families were in poor status and their proportion of living was very low in the provided year.
The category of sole parents had biggest readings of poverty of all other families, while single aged persons had the poorest testimony of life in all Australia. Moreover, single aged person households in proportion had 6 per cent of misery. In contrast, category without children had in 3 times more percentage of poverty at the same time. Couples with children had in 2 times better level of life than couples who had children with them (12%). It obvious that all households without children had less misery than families with children. In addition, it means that their children did not play any role in money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-05 | Azizat Gilmeyeva | 56 | view |
- - 11
- Some people think that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- The given table illustrates the information about the amount of miles travelled by different types of travelling. 56
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. 56
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation What might be be the case What could be disadvantages of being self employed 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the biggest'.
Suggestion: had the biggest
...d year. The category of sole parents had biggest readings of poverty of all other famili...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 778.0 1615.20841683 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 152.0 315.596192385 48% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11842105263 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 4.20363070211 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68408152425 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 176.041082164 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 506.74238477 46% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6157478613 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.25 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14699442338 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688973311011 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815634459748 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14349920837 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827407701015 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 78.4519038076 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.