The bar chart illustrates the sum of minutes in the British about phone calls between 1995 and 2002. There are three types of the phone call, which include local, national and international and mobiles.
It can be clearly seen that the leader of three types is local as well as the second is national and international, the above two types are also fixed line. Overall, the trend of mobile usages is increased.
In 1995, the calling time by local was transcended 70 billion minutes, 30 billion minutes for national and international as well as lower than 5 billion minutes about mobiles with all calls. Please noted that the spending time of the above two types this year was the smallest. The trends of these three types raised significantly until 1999, up to 90, 50 and 15 billion minutes independently.
After 1999, there are some different trending. The usage of local started to fall dramatically from 90 to 73 billions minutes in 2002. By contrast, national and international and mobiles were rose gradually by 10 and 30 billion minutes in the year 2002.
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of highschool programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood orteaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67430626893 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565934065934 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7583524579 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171904475363 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699047562722 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597495861772 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109681821023 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527847559685 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.