The given bar graph elucidates how people in the USA frequently ate fast food in restaurants. The comparison includes the three years, i.e. 2003, 2006 and 2013.
Overall, only 4% of people chose to go to restaurants on a daily basis in the year 2003, which felt slightly decreased to 2% in 2006 and remain the same. By this, the people in the USA visit restaurants, several times a week had 17% of ratio and it is smoothly increased to 20% in 2006 but afterward again it goes down to 16% in 2013. The highest number of US citizens likes to go on weekends which involved 31% in 2003, further, it is more occupied and grows by 3% in 2006, While this category also faced the downfall of up to 8-9% after 2006.
Another category, once or twice a month had similar people included as a weekend category in 2003, and it is decreased by 5% in 2006 which improved rapidly and had 34% of people. Moreover, the people who only go to a few times in a year had 12% in 2003 and remains at 15% in both the years. Lastly, the citizens who never visited restaurants had 5% of people who stays on slight decreased to 4% in 2006 and 2013.
- what are the pros and consequences of public transport? 78
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities.Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home, leisure and work activities.To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant 73
- Computers and modems have made it possible for office workers to do much of their work from home instead of working in offices every day. Working from home should be encouraged as it is good for workers and employers. 73
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The comparison includes the three years, i.e. 2003, 2006 and 2013. Overall, o...
^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., i.e. 2003, 2006 and 2013. Overall, only 4% of people chose to go to restaur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, lastly, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.30985915493 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4013981248 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553990610329 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7368492028 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252849161662 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12635350432 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104854957717 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218647300251 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134082277134 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.