The different modes of transport used to travels to and from work in one European city in1960, 1980 and 2000
The using of vehicles to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000 in one European city is presented in the line graph.
Overall, the car traffic rose dramatically while the bus traffic showed the reverse. Moreover, both train and tube were fluctuated in this period. Also, more citizen liked better to use car compared to other vehicles in the end of the periods.
The train traffic incline steadily between 1960 and 1980 while the tube showed the reverse by virtually 7. A dramatic decrease was seen in the bus traffic by 15 although the car increased sharply to almost 25.
By 2000, the car traffic had reached a new peak to almost 40 while the bus had fallen sharply to 15. A slight increase had been seen in the tube traffic to 25. The used of train had gone down steadily to just above 20.
- Due to human activities on land and in the sea, he animals are becoming extinct. What are the reasons and Solutions? 73
- The consumption of fast food in the UK from 1970 to 1990. 73
- The different modes of transport used to travels to and from work in one European city in1960, 1980 and 2000 61
- The differences in wheat exports over three different areas between 1985 and 1990. 73
- The Proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 679.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46710526316 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22441400357 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546052631579 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8452354556 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.4444444444 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19378128294 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801735585819 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168323701891 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162229651652 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.225632569157 0.0819641961636 275% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.35 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.