Violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree?
There is no denying the fact that Media of today is playing an outstanding role in creating and shaping of public opinion and strengthening of society. Considering this fact, there is a belief that media encourages members of society to act abnormally by broadcasting the acts of atrocity. This essay disagrees with their point of view and would exhibit how unacceptable actions are also demoralized by such content shown in media.
To commence with the reasons why some social workers claim that the act of cruelty on TV triggers atrocity in reality. The first argument is that it encourages some people to commit the same crime for popularity. Criminals often receive publicity; therefore some of the news followers want to gain fame by perpetrating a similar crime. Another reason is that violence in mass media may mislead immature minds. Young people may express themselves violently in response to disagreement with other children, when this kind of publication encourages them by immoral pictures. Furthermore, it frequently motives more people carry weapons as protection means. For example, in Pakistan, people tend to hold either guns or knives as self-defense, which also increase the possibility of new crimes.
Contrarily, some media advocates believe that reported acts of cruelty has positive effects on society for the following reasons. First of all, it makes people aware of criminals. For example, newspapers often show pictures of former sex-offenders with the description their offense in order to notify people of their atrocious behavior as well as never leave their children alone. Secondly, media warns people of the consequences of breaking a law. People are often unaware of possible implications if they decide to assault others, but TV programs about outlaws can deter them from their illegal intention. Finally, broadcasting both violence and subsequent apprehension usually persuades citizens that police officers always protect them from violators. People often blame the police force for their inaction; however, documentaries regarding various crimes with the ultimate arrest may change their prejudice about policemen.
In conclusion, even though sociologists argue that cruelty highlighted on mass media causes brutal conduct in public, I am not only opposed to them, but also I think that such media highlights discourages anti-social actions in community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | avneet28 | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | lokeshpareek87 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | being | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | mohammed123 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | mohammed123 | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that they have right to keep all their earnings and can neglect taxes. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this? 89
- Nowadays sending children to boarding school (either in other countries or in their own countries)is becoming popular. Why is it? Is it a positive development? 78
- The Internet contains a lot of information that can help people however sometimes the information is inaccurate or wrong Do you Agree or Disagree 63
- The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue. Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth, while others claim that it damages local industries. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Childcare is important. Some people think that parents should require child training courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nals often receive publicity; therefore some of the news followers want to gain fame by per...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51761517615 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87880656966 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628726287263 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4497936845 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.111111111 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0908275742927 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314377339624 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450927570263 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0581434174833 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152799752514 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.