People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In today's modern world, goods have become more affordable for the society. From my point of view, the drawbacks of lower-priced products would eclipse the benefits.
To begin with, there are a variety of reasons why economical goods is absolutely preferable. The major merit is that people are likely to save money which serve for another purposes. Fundamental needs such as clothes and electrical devices are gradually devalued by the time, so the distribution of household income is essentially spent more on education and nutrition. In addition, consumers don't have to estimate the price nervously, owing to depreciated products. Therefore, unfortunate people may have ample opportunities for certain ranges of lower-priced merchandises as well as heighten their living standards.
Nevertheless, I suppose that the repercussion of reasonable products should be paid more attention. The first concern of every company is that their business strategy will be unable to provide enough economical commodities if a huge demand from residents is considerably increasing. As a result, the larger amount of product consumption, the more extensively many manufactures misuse their labour. As well as this, it is said that purchasers commonly associate cheaper goods with low quality. For instance, female customers who are shopaholic enjoy big sales of certain stores to please themselves with luxurious items, but find disappointing about those afterwards. Though they may not purchase much on buying, their wages are wasted on fixing or acquiring new ones.
To summarise, despite some obvious advantages of the fact that residents are able to charge a lower price for products in recent years, I consider that these are outweighed by the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n and nutrition. In addition, consumers dont have to estimate the price nervously, o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ell as heighten their living standards. Nevertheless, I suppose that the repercu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...quality. For instance, female customers who are shopaholic enjoy big sales of certain s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, i suppose, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5873605948 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05052056366 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68029739777 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.526976725 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.357142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0910304160278 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282994430168 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334500706371 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591937470645 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341029055943 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.