The following charts represent the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The figure elucidates the weight measurements of individuals who lived in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. At first glance, it is evident that ideal category has enormous percentage in both different years.
To begin with 2015, ideal aspect has become the biggest indicator in three age range which were 20-29, 30-39 and 40-49 where it approximately had between two-fifths and seven-tenths and it placed as the second rank in 50-59 and 60-69’s age range. In contrast, the obese indicator dominated in 50-59 and 60-69’s age range where it roughly had more than 50% for both aspects. Unfortunately, it had a slight percentage in the other age ranges. This case also happened for overweight and underweight category where it merely had a small percentage in comparison with the first two group.
In accordance with 1955, it can be seen that it was dominated by ideal percentage where it had percentage from 45% through to seven-tenths. However, the other indicators such as overweight, underweight and obese had an enormous differences according to their percentage with ideal aspect where all of them had smaller percentage, which made up around 0% to 42%, rather than ideal category.
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people.Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- the pie charts and table give information about the total value of fish imported to the us between 1988 and 2000. 73
- The map indicates several significant changes in a centre from 2005 to the present day 84
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
- People live longer today ,and therefore they should work longer? to what extent do you agree or disagree?? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'group' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'groups'.
Suggestion: groups
...entage in comparison with the first two group. In accordance with 1955, it can be ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'difference'?
Suggestion: difference
..., underweight and obese had an enormous differences according to their percentage with idea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19689119171 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97078764138 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585492227979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6042451413 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.375 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0973504559703 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585703168703 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850805163107 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885126135294 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060068050043 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.