Some people think that the government wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Art and culture demonstrates the heritage as well as the evolvement of the nation. Spending assets on the arts, sculptures, museums, monuments represents the richness of the history moreover it allures the holiday makers. This essay will highlight the mixed view on spending money on arts. Afcourse, the economic growth rises with foreign exchange but still there is a need to develop the vulnerable section of the hinterland.

                        Developing nations always endeavour to escalate the growth of the economy by multiple methods. For example :- inviting the foreign investors, creating the monuments, building the sculptures and by breaking the world's records in the area of art and craft. On the other hand countries also encourage the craftsmen to excel in their own field by bestowing them required facilities.

                    Nowadays a host of eminent artists who contributed for the society and nation by their unforgettable tasks stimulate the youngsters to promote the heritage. The prize money of the contests associated with art prompts the myraid of grownups to shift their career in this field. Thus, these volunteers become the backbone of nation and always try to innovate new ideas in the field of art and encourage the bureaucrats to do more investment on art to beat the competition worldwide.

                    While the authorities promoting the archeological sites, to make people aware about their rich culture, the drawbacks also contributing the adverse affect in the success of the country. The unbalanced expenditures aggrevating the situation of destitute. Instead of bringing the vulnerable section in the mainstream the funds spending on the historical arts increasingly rapidly. According to the survey, one third of the world's total population is deprived of housing facilities. So it shows the dearth of important needs.

                The attitude of competition with neighbour countries stimulates the government to bestow the proofs of the significant progress. So, they generally follow idea of spending money in useless projects instead of  working the roots of the problems. This is one the major illusion to the people and authorities that nation is evolving rapidly. Consequently, the development of the country without the progress of the natives is vain.

                 Before putting my pen down, I would like to mention that no doubt spending money on art and culture shows the glory of success and development but the expenditure to uplift the life cycle of the people is the fundamental duty of the bureaucrats.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e vulnerable section of the hinterland.                         Developing natio...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by bestowing them required facilities.                     Nowadays a host of e...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... art to beat the competition worldwide.                     While the authoritie...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 550, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it shows the dearth of important needs.                 The attitude of competit...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing money in useless projects instead of  working the roots of the problems. This ...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he progress of the natives is vain.                  Before putting my pen down, I would like...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, still, third, thus, well, while, for example, no doubt, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74812967581 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.60825511421 2.80592935109 164% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561097256858 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7320676514 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.05 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171449972161 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046032603811 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588876599197 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836747009267 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457973439844 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.