The line graph illustrates the effect of two different kinds of sugar including fruit sugar and cane sugar as well as honey on tooth.
It can be seen clearly that eating cane can produce the highest acid level among three sweet foods, leading to the maximum possibility of tooth decay, whereas eating honey is unlikely to have tooth decay.
The graph shows the levels of acid are generated in mouth after sweets are consumed. The higher level of acid is demonstrated by the lower ph value and there will be occurrence of tooth decay when the ph goes below 5.5. At the moment when sugar and honey are eaten, the acid levels are the lowest, at ph 7. After 5 minutes, the ph level for cane sugar increases to 3.5, which is the highest compared to the other 2 sweets and it is not until after 40 minutes, the figure returns to its initial level at ph 7.
The change trends of honey and fruit sugar are similar to that of cane sugar. However, a slight difference is that from 5 minutes to 10 minutes, the acidity of honey remains the same, at ph 4.8
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health.You should write at least 150 words. 73
- Some people think young people should be free to choose their job, while others believe that they should be realistic and think about their future. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people believe arts such as painting and music cannot directly improve the quality of people s lives so that government money should be spent on other things To what extent do you agree or disagree 64
- The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41538461538 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17441944764 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.709523606 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2812712545 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133783432037 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093406275813 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155780834047 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112605510979 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.