People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
It is important to have good strategies to make decisions. Also, it often recommends that it is better to decide something when she/he is logical and rational rather than when she/he is too emotional. However, the statement undermines the functions of emotions that are beneficial to make decisions. The question would be like finding which is the first between eggs and chicken.
Being emotional could be harmful when we are in a situation we need to decide something. We might end up being too impulsive and would regret what we have decided for. For example, if someone just finds that his or her friend is sinking in the ocean, provoked emotions due to the emergent situation might hinder the person to decide what actions to take firstly. Depending on the degree of emotions that the person has, emotions could be domineering and delay the mental processing of decision making in the most rational ways.
However, Even though being emotional can disrupt him/her to make the most logical decisions, emotions do not always interrupt to reach to the best decisions. Emotions are often beneficial and have some great functions to help us how to interact with our environment we are living in. It often times gives better information around us so that we can decide in better ways. emotions usually function and have a role that initiates and motivates someone to decide things. Again, using the example used above, it could be possible that emotions is an obstacle to make a decision within the limited amount of time when a friend is sunk in the ocean. However, without emotions, the person would not be able to feel that the situation is urgent and is not aware that the person would need to react quickly and make decisions faster than others. Therefore, emotions may help us to initiate our actions in prompt ways.
According to the statement, it argues that there may a certain way to make the best decisions. However, the processes of making decisions are quite complicated and would function in infinitive ways in different situation. Thus, it cannot necessarily be said that poor decision makers consider logics after they consider their emotions first. In order to plan a schedule, there are many aspects that we need to consider other than just our feelings, emotions, and logics. All humans are living in a society in which people interact with others. Sometimes, we need to listen to each other in order to reach a goal. For instance, a leader of a company in which the goal is usually having higher profit would need to collect others’ opinion for the company to grow better. It would not be possible to decide the best decision alone to develop the company.
Also, there are some group of people who need help to make decisions. For example, teenagers or children who are yet vulnerable to make decision by themselves, it is necessary to help them to make better decision because they are still young and have relatively less experience than be parents or people who take care of them such as teachers. Better guidance would promote them to have better and realistic goal for them and realize their goal faster and safely.
Likewise, making decision doesn’t always take not only emotions and logic, but also there are many factors that affect to produce better decisions. Therefore, it would not be proper to say people who consider logics after considering emptions are poor decision makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 27
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 66
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's recent s 69
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 55
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Emotions
...s so that we can decide in better ways. emotions usually function and have a role that i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 22, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...lop the company. Also, there are some group of people who need help to make decisio...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ary to help them to make better decision because they are still young and have re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, may, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2848.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 579.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91882556131 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90534594407 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52194972222 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436960276339 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 909.0 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7214594634 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6785714286 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17857142857 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281262583826 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828693325845 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811799952041 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177747270785 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908525399245 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.