The diagram below show the development of the village of Kelsbey between 1780 and 2000
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
There was an outstanding metamorphosis in the village of Kelsbey during a 220-year period, from 1780 to 2000. In the northeast of the lower section, a vast number of houses was remarkably renovated in 90 years. The village was 5-time extension than it used to be. Come up with homes, many social benefits were established. This village is unprecedentedly modified from industrial to commercial. People can see the demotion of farmland and trees in 1860. On the contrary, natural sources were demolished to make space for roads and sports fields in 2000. In the southwest of the village, an immersive bridge was constructed. Proximate to it was shops. Subsequently, a man-made wetland for birds has erected just a stone’s throw away from shops.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-17 | NhungNtdghtn | 56 | view |
- the expenditure on fast food by different income groups in UK in 1990 67
- The main sources of energy of USA in 1980 and 1990. 61
- The diagram below show the development of the village of Kelsbey between 1780 and 2000Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 67
- The pie charts below compare the water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 626.0 965.302439024 65% => OK
No of words: 123.0 196.424390244 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08943089431 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.33024571262 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03638673287 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.691056910569 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 187.2 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2762734595 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.6 112.824112599 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.3 22.9334400587 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0675768677035 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0240640099632 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347906201624 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0675768677035 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.35 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.