Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based
The author believes that in any field those in power shall step down after five years. The contention provided by the author is backed by the reason that the ultimate path to success for any enterprise is through change in leader. I disagree to this claim.
The issue addresses the need for change in any field of the leader whether it be education or business. There are several cases where this argument may not prove to be efficious.
In the realm of business or education, if we were to implement this in real world, it might lead to severe problems. first is, if the leader elected is having a vision he/she requires time to implement that vision and to efficiently deploy his strategy a mere time of five years might be insufficient. Also, the new leader elected might not concur with the idea of previous leader and might completely change the strategy leaving company employees in a Multintional Corporation or a students in schools in total chaos.
When it comes to politics, a change of leader in every five years may bring schisms in party internally and hence, lead to end of that party. What is leader? Leader is the one that guides rest of the people for a common cause, and if the leaders keep on changing than due to difference in ideologies, the members of the party might pulverise and form different groups withing a single party, that is, one group of members following an ideology of the previous leader and second group in which the members follow the ideology of current leader.
But when it comes to government, it might be a game changer, as if we keep on electing same and same government, it might create a situation where leader feels he is invincible. For example- the case of north korea's leader he feels he is invincible and does whatever he wants, and due to this insurgence of this self- centric idiosyncrasy he doesn't think of his fellow country men and only does what quenches his thrust for power.
In sum, the generalization for every enterprise is not apposite. Also, the author's rigidity in time allocation might bring out the opposite result.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large 50
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species. 33
- People's behaviour is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...orld, it might lead to severe problems. first is, if the leader elected is having a v...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... follow the ideology of current leader. But when it comes to government, it migh...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 343, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e of this self- centric idiosyncrasy he doesnt think of his fellow country men and onl...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 401, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'quench'?
Suggestion: quench
...s fellow country men and only does what quenches his thrust for power. In sum, the ge...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 76, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...y enterprise is not apposite. Also, the authors rigidity in time allocation might bring...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73224043716 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56710819644 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508196721311 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.6555389002 60.3974514979 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.466666667 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152710706145 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678022392467 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967500663542 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105649800471 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13347022623 0.0667264976115 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.