mars, moon, spacecraft, earth, pressure
The main idea of both the passage and the lecture is about living on other planet like Venus. In this regard, the passage explains that the condition on Venus is extremely inhospitable and human cannot live in the surface of this planet. The lecturer, on the other hand, categorically denies all the three evidence provided by the passage, citing that although living in Venus might be challenging, it is possible. He further adds that with the sude of a station that floats 15 kilometer above the surface of the planet, problems mentioned in the passage can be solved.
First, both the text and the talk discuss the idea of atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface. In this regard, the text states that because of high pressure, spacecraft will crash on the surface of this planet. Conversely, the lecturer address this problem, explaining that with the station that floats high from the surface, the pressure can be lower and it will indeed be equal to Earth's pressure. As a result, there will be no danger of getting crushed.
Second, both the reading and the listening materials put forth the idea of water and oxygen supply on the surface of Venus. In this line of thought, the text states that only carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid are present in the surface planet and water should be imported from Earth. However, the lecturer asserts that these chemical compounds would be enough to make water and consequently there is no need to import water from Earth, because water and oxygen can be made out of these chemical compounds.
Third, both the passage and the lecture talk about the sunlight that reaches the Venus' surface. In this vein, the author maintains that because of the thick layers of cloud, it is highly probable that no sunlight reaches its surface. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes this notion, citing that when the station is standing 15 kilometers above the surface, it will absorb some sunlight and the clouds are actually thinner in that height. Moreover, the reflected sunlight can also be absorbed through solar power of the stations. Therefore, enough electricity and power can be made from the direct absorption and the reflected sunlight.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
- Summarize the point made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 479, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...th the sude of a station that floats 15 kilometer above the surface of the planet, proble...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 381, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'earth'.
Suggestion: Earth
...be lower and it will indeed be equal to Earths pressure. As a result, there will be no...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, conversely, first, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 368.0 270.72406181 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91847826087 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41827063105 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461956521739 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3388285579 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.125 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0608949768897 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0209333482895 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334825817786 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0425938199761 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499923234881 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.