Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?

Technology development has changed by the changing era. Nowadays, Interaction is not difficult for us as long as we are going to communicate with someone, launch our social applications in the electronic devices is the only step to reach it. I strongly believe that the advantages of this statement are outweighing the disadvantages.
To begin with, mature technology makes us more closely with each other. For instance, the only way to meet a new person in the past must be in real life, we cannot know someone easily on the internet, the restriction causes the meeting methods narrow. But we can realize our dream now, send a message as well as have a conversation with our friends or families will be simple to complete if we are registered on social media or communication applications, like FACEBOOK or TELEGRAM. Also, we may add the unknown as soon as who gets the same interest with you via social media. Therefore, the developed technology zooms in the distance of each person.
The modern technology is a positive development as far as we know how to control it. While it is convenient, frauds are existing on the internet. Take a known example as a reference, an elder people was lied by fraud, a million dollars as well as the property of this elder were stolen. So, we must recognize the dangers on the internet if we are going to use it, to avoid the disadvantages of modern technology. Hence, I believe that the development is positive as long as we can distinguish the risk on social media.
In conclusion, the latest techniques lead to a close relationship during the world as well as each person. Although it may dangerous on some circumstance, I believe that it is positive when we acknowledge the risk and use it with correct functions.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lain'.
Suggestion: lain
...ple as a reference, an elder people was lied by fraud, a million dollars as well as ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7737704918 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96070475424 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560655737705 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0834210526 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190261775864 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690232778008 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575228466247 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109244687178 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195385884512 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.