The two maps illustrates the pathways used to gain entry into a City Hospital in 2007 and 2010.
Overall, the City healthcare facilities were more expanded and developed with additional features in 2010 than it was earlier in 2007. The hospital retained its Ring Road and City Road whereas the initial bus stop has been replaced by a bus station and staff car park with creation of two roundabouts.
In 2007, the medical centre only had City Road located east of the building with a hospital road lying in close proximity to the bus stop at both sides which leads to a car park for staff and public at the south east. The Ring Road is situated at the north with the City Hospital at the centre.
On the other hand, the hospital was well developed in 2010. The City Road now possed a roundabout leading to the hospital road situated between a bus stop and staff car park. Furthermore, a separate place has been built for the public to park their vehicles.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for agricultural purposes in six areas of the world
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighbouring town since 1962 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 10
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
... building with a hospital road lying in close proximity to the bus stop at both sides which lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, well, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57225433526 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35228158202 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531791907514 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2138191975 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219577650679 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111878085786 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625617718004 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1623343381 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491757456697 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.