The right to privacy is one of the pillars of democracy along with the principle of rule of law, freedom of expression, the right to peaceful assembly, and so on. Therefore, it should be guaranteed to everyone in a democratic society irrespective of his or her occupation. In this regard, I am prone to believe that famous people are not fully protected from the interference to their private and family lives. I hold this opinion since they are constantly at the center of the public attention; they are deprived of the possibility to sue entities or people who violate their privacy; and they often quit their jobs to live an ordinary life.
To begin with, the media is a nightmare for celebrities since it follows their each step. Generally, all the actions and thoughts of entertainers and athletes are being publicized by the media regardless of the fact whether those events are related to their professional career /, /or not. Public is aware of all the details of the private life of stars from what a person likes to drink in the evenings to what color is preferred by the celebrity. For example, the headings of the major newspapers in my country practically always contain something sensational about actors beloved by the society. Furthermore, often photos taken during private events with the participation of celebrities appear on the front pages of magazines. So, the overwhelming attention toward celebrities is an undeniable fact.
Additionally, the fame often rules out the possibility to initiate legal proceedings to protect the privacy of well-known people. This is explained by the fact that society does not approve the legal actions of well-known people to secure their privacy due to various reasons. Most important, ordinary people think that celebrities should be available to public whenever and wherever they like, and, therefore, in their opinion famous people should not have privacy. For instance, a friend of mine is a TV show star and is well-known in my country as one of the most talented entertainers ever. Once he decided to sue the reporter who managed to take photos of my friend’s private meeting with his parents and published them. After he referred to the legal mechanisms of protection of his rights everyone started to criticize him for his actions. As a result, the entertainer had to give up his intention. Thus, although the famous people have the possibility to protect their privacy, the society does not respect this right.
Finally, an indication of the violating of the rights of celebrities is the fact that they often quit their jobs to live an ordinary life. This is due to the natural expectation of every person to have some space of privacy which should be respected. For example, the person who I mentioned in the previous paragraph quitted his job and is on the /his / way to become a lawyer. To be sincere, he seems to be happier now when no reporter disturbs him.
To sum up briefly, there are a lot of advantages of being a famous person. However, it is fact that their right to privacy is being violated everywhere since people want to know everything about them, they are not always able to guarantee their rights and often quit their professions to become ordinary people.
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a travel guide 76
- Extra money paid to professors help to increase the quality of education. 76
- Written paragraph:In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is toassemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offersseveral advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider rang 80
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. 60
- Dynamic changes in the world make our lives less comfortable 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... paragraph quitted his job and is on the /his / way to become a lawyer. To be sin...
^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... professions to become ordinary people.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 96.0 52.1666666667 184% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2702.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 548.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93065693431 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79150778299 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476277372263 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 865.8 618.680645161 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4535591749 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.583333333 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100549216942 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030875727669 0.076458572812 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251851439438 0.0737576698707 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600292520605 0.150856017488 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151530297007 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.