The Charts compare the amount of electricity produced by 5 different fuel sources in Australia and France from 1980 to 2000
Overall, the total electricity units produced in 2000 were more higher than that in 1980 in both countries. Moreover, there were significant rises in the uses of coal in Australia and nuclear power in France in term of producing electricity throughout the period.
In 1980, coal was the main source of electricity production in Australia, which accounted for half the total amount. In contrast, Natural gas along with Coal were mostly used to generate electricity in France , with the number of 25 in term of units for each. While there was no sign of using nuclear power in electricity production in Australia in the whole period, the figure for this fuel source in France was 15 units in the year 1980
The amount of electricity units produced by coal increased to 130 units in Australia, only 4 units higher than that of nuclear power in France. while the figure for Hydro power in the former country rose by 16 units from the initial point of 20 units, that of the latter country slightly decreased to 2 units in 2000. Moreover, Coal and Oil each accounted for 2 units in Australia and 25 units in France.
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about dangers of committing a crime. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n Australia and France from 1980 to 2000 Overall, the total electricity units pro...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...electricity units produced in 2000 were more higher than that in 1980 in both countries. Mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y used to generate electricity in France , with the number of 25 in term of units ...
^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in France was 15 units in the year 1980 The amount of electricity units produced...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...r than that of nuclear power in France. while the figure for Hydro power in the forme...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75462962963 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56295782003 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.91600739 43.030603864 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.714285714 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8571428571 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277591532356 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148207101322 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791754200726 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206392776327 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690615245016 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.