"Medical experts say that only one-quarter of Corpora's citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness, even though twenty years ago, one-half of all of Corpora's citizens met the standards as then defined. But these experts are mistaken when they suggest that spending too much time using computers has caused a decline in fitness. Since overall fitness levels are highest in regions of Corpora where levels of computer ownership are also highest, it is clear that using computers has not made citizens less physically fit. Instead, as shown by this year's unusually low expenditures on fitness-related products and services, the recent decline in the economy is most likely the cause, and fitness levels will improve when the economy does."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The author’s argument that an improvement in economy levels will consequently improve the fitness levels is not entirely logically cogent, because it is not strong enough requiring more information and weighting.
The fact that one-half of all Corpora’s citizens met the standards of physical fitness compared with one-quarter twenty years later can not effectively endorse author’s argument that has been a decline in fitness because it is not stated details of these standards and it may has changed over twenty years. Moreover, it is not stated the size sample of these percentages, in other words, we do not know how many citizens met these standards along the years. The population surely grown and this variation in percentages may not express a significant decline in physical fitness.
The author suggests that the experts are inaccurate when they state that the increase in time using computers can lead to a decrease in fitness. The author argument that fitness levels are highest in regions where computer ownership are also highest, consequently the author conclude that using computers does not decrease citizens fitness. Nevertheless, there is not a strong connection between these facts because ownership does not imply usage of computer. For instance, a lot of people may have a computer or several but even so not spend a lot of time using it.
The author implies that the recent unexpected low expenditure on services and fitness products were induced by the decline in the economy, however, this may not be true and can not effectively endorsed because the low expenditures may be result from an elevation in prices of fitness products and services. For example, people reduce the consumption of these products if they are expensive, but they may purchase it in travels.
Although the decline in the economy and the decrease in fitness may be related, the author’s arguments are not completely sound since supporting sentences are not strong and well related enough.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Abhipray Singh | 82 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | chapagain08 | 72 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | kielassaf | 43 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | PC99 | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | christine_cui | 69 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- TPO - writing integrated taskSummarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage - a project with a team of people 80
- TOEFL integrated writing Chevalier de Seingalt 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 321 350
No. of Characters: 1638 1500
No. of Different Words: 152 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.233 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.103 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.675 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 133 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 108 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.182 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.743 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.909 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.397 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.687 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.125 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ters can lead to a decrease in fitness. The author argument that fitness levels are...
^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'endorse'
Suggestion: endorse
...may not be true and can not effectively endorsed because the low expenditures may be res...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, even so, for example, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 2260.96107784 75% => OK
No of words: 321.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29283489097 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86563385937 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501557632399 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 705.55239521 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.7312455066 57.8364921388 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.454545455 119.503703932 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 23.324526521 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 5.70786347227 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163879661585 0.218282227539 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620443889435 0.0743258471296 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086200270347 0.0701772020484 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771736920329 0.128457276422 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114610188101 0.0628817314937 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.3799401198 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.3550499002 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.32208582834 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 12.3882235529 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.