Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa

Well-recognized baskets have been seen only in the nearby village of Palea and therefore believed they were made only by the people of Palea. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered a basket of "Palea" in Lithos, an ancient village in Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and wide, and so the ancient callers could cross the boat only, and no old boats were found. It follows that the sessions called Palean were not exclusively Jewish.

Paleamn basket are not unique for many reasons, but the author’s claim is unfounded. The river is deep and wide, so it can only be crossed by boat. This may not be true. There are various way of ferry through water. For a deep wide river, there can be bridge if the water is slow. By ridging ropes and floating objects, afloat bridge can handle large amount of commerce activity.

Boat can be various form, for example, balloon boat made of animal skins can provide high lift with very low weight. Balloon boats can easily decompose.

If there is no boat found, there can be various reasons, for example termites destroyed the boats already. There can also be the ice age final flood and destroyed everything.

Even Palean baskets are not exclusive found in Palean, Palean didn’t trade, Palean can exchange knowledge and population. For example, ancient people already knew you can’t marry your mother or sister, villages often exchange brides.

The situation we have today is inaccurate, the Brim River may not exist in ancient times, or Lithos people are Palea people migrated some year before or after the basket discovery.

Votes
Average: 5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... By ridging ropes and floating objects, afloat bridge can handle large amount of...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 13.6137724551 7% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 28.8173652695 28% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 55.5748502994 34% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 2260.96107784 60% => OK
No of words: 269.0 441.139720559 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04460966543 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54887412479 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 204.123752495 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57249070632 0.468620217663 122% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 705.55239521 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6926193966 57.8364921388 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8235294118 119.503703932 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8235294118 23.324526521 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58823529412 5.70786347227 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191437943984 0.218282227539 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610088075588 0.0743258471296 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102402650603 0.0701772020484 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094869798236 0.128457276422 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110617837631 0.0628817314937 176% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.3799401198 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.3550499002 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.5979740519 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 98.500998004 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 270 350
No. of Characters: 1272 1500
No. of Different Words: 151 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.054 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.711 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.241 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 88 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 57 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.882 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.668 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.706 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.315 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.598 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.118 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5