Government funding for pure science endeavors, such as space exploration, should be
reduced in order to direcct more funding towards humanitarian science projects.
In this statement, the author claims that government funding for pure science should be reduced and more funding towards humanitarian science project. I agree with the author statement because the government should more be focused on the better growth of the human than space exploration. Moreover, pure science is also important for the betterment of civilization and it also helps a country to earn revenue. It enhances our knowledge and helps to communicate better with others.
Funding on humanitarian science projects is more essential. For instances, in rural area doctors are scare because of lack of facility in the hospital, lack of instrument like ECG machine, ICU facility etc. Moreover, the condition of the hospital infrastructure and overall facility is less for a patient. If the government increase funding in this sector more eligible doctor will be attracted to those hospitals and people can get better treatment. In many areas, children are deprived of vaccination, polio and other antibiotic medicine which are needed for a children's better life. Another important area is agriculture which is always lack of facility. Farmers are cultivated with the traditional instrument and technological advancement is needed in this sector and more funding or subsidiary also.
However, pure science helps to advance technology and make less difficult the human life. For example, the satellite makes communication more easy and less time-consuming. Using telecommunication science will connect with people very efficiently. By making a call on the internet a doctor can consult the critical matter with other doctors about the patient condition. Moreover, satellite forecasting weather details before the day and any farmer can predict the weather and then cultivate their crops efficiently. Thus, these are possible for the pure science of space exploration.
Therefore, space exploration is also essential for enhancing a better life. Funding is important for those cases but I think the government should use funding where it is more necessary and then cut the funding in the less necessary area. For example, in Africa people are very poor and the government utilize maximum funding on human.
To conclude, these two cases are important in their own place and we cannot take over one another because both are needed for human betterment. Together they can make a better place live for human.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-30 | Seema Modak | 50 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppor 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to jobs that are very different from their parents' job. Use specific reasons and examples to support you 71
- If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience. 50
- Some people say that Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- In order to help small business thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business matters. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 800, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...s sector and more funding or subsidiary also. However, pure science helps to adva...
^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an make a better place live for human.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41005291005 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90082350754 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489417989418 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8932551677 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.9545454545 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31818181818 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354220641454 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114241325984 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127784139626 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205606916497 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113640275807 0.0667264976115 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.