The two pie charts illustrates the proportion of male and females in employment that are divided into six different field of occupations and are equally divided to manual and non-manual category in Great Britain in the year 1992.
The two pie charts illustrates the proportion of male and females in employment that are divided into six different field of occupations and are equally divided to manual and non-manual category in Great Britain in the year 1992.
Overall, it was clear that for both sexes, the highest percentage accounted for managerial and professional occupation under non-manual category, while the least proportion for men and women works as general laborers under manual category.
In the manual occupations, men and women had almost leveled out in the “other manual” occupations with over a quarter. In contrast, the percentage of crafts occupation for males were nearly a quarter and it had an eight-fold difference from the proportion of female group at only 3%. Then for general laborers, male were only higher with one percent compared to females at 2% and 1%, accordingly.
For non-manual occupations, in the managerial and professional field, male were higher at more than a third compared to women which were only less than a third. But, for clerical or related jobs, women dominated at 31%, which was a quarter difference to the proportion of men. Apparently, other non-manual occupations, both sexes accounted for less than one in ten, having the female group higher by 3%.
- the pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 56
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- the flow charts below show the vicious circles of poverty at the institutional and individual levels 74
- Problem Today s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 86
- The obesity rate among teenagers has increased dramatically in many developed countries Discuss some possible reasons for this increase and suggestions 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'field' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'fields'.
Suggestion: fields
...ent that are divided into six different field of occupations and are equally divided ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, but, if, then, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24637681159 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92882738065 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526570048309 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.798604413 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.75 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409847955144 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207874036204 0.103423049105 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.300533895835 0.0843802449381 356% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350165945041 0.15604864568 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.375418668562 0.0819641961636 458% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.