Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship. Do you agree or disagree?
Truth is the most benevolent and at the same time the most severe thing in this world. Although many people try to say only the truth, it’s in fact impossible. In my opinion, however, it’s the most important deliberation in any relationship between mankind.
To begin with, people who say only the truth are more esteemed and trustworthy. These two characteristics can help people to succeed in their career and easily climb the corporate ladder, as anyone around them respect them and try everything to fit their needs. My fathers’ example proofs the statement made above. He has a habit to not to lie in any cases, when even it is necessary to do so. Firstly, he only suffered from that habit, as some people were using this characteristic for their own benefits. However, by the time he stopped relationship with them, and conveyed to another friend zone. It goes without saying that there he felt like a fish in the water, inasmuch as people there started to appreciate his wonderful habit. So by the help of his new friends and their encouragement to do big things he has quickly advanced through the ranks of his company. This example demonstrates how astonishingly good habit and friend zone can affect to peoples’ life.
Furthermore, the relationship based on lies is not the good one, as it doesn’t last long and make people stressful. So personally speaking I hold the opinion that in order to prosper and thrive in relationship, people should only tell the truth. For instance, my uncle has already divorced four times. The reason was simple, insomuch as he is like my father, he can’t lie and it’s obvious that he hates people who are not like him. Unfortunately, he has married and divorced four times as he didn’t even guess that these women were not like him. Now he is in deep stress and doesn’t want to interact with others. Considering the mistakes of my uncle, now I am searching for my spouse with paying attention to all the details and calculating all misconceptions.
In conclusion, based on the factors and examples mentioned above I strongly agree with the statement that telling the truth is so important in any relationship. Inasmuch as this characteristic facilitates people to succeed in career and create great and strong bonds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-03 | hakobyan04.07 | 70 | view |
- THE GRAPH BELLOW SHOWS THE POPULATION FIGURES FOR DIFFERENT TYPE OF TURTLES IN INDIA FROM 1980 TO 2012 73
- Integrated 3
- Advantage/ disadvantage 11
- LEADERS AND DIRECTORS IN ALL ORGANIZATIONS ARE NORMALLY OLDER PEOPLE. SOME PEOPLE THINK YOUNGER LEADER WOULD BE BETTER.AGREE OR DISAGREE 67
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far out-weight the disadvantages. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reer and create great and strong bonds.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in any case, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95103092784 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93183782393 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538659793814 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9437781228 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4761904762 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4761904762 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144911321274 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517843091854 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771009957729 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130265720238 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816546928627 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.