Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the field
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether university should require every student to study the variable courses out of the field or not during the academic period. Studying the different courses out of the field differs from student to student. Despite the fact, that student’s pursuing the courses out of the intended field have extra knowledge and different way of thinking irrespective of their initial course. But, requiring students to take the other courses in addition to their initial course can also result in lack of interest in their initial course. Specifically, those students who have straight targets toward their success may tend to take the initial courses too seriously, and thus by requiring them to take the other courses would consequently affect their initial courses too due to lack of focus. Therefore, Universities should not require every students to take a variety of courses instead universities should let the students to decide whether they would benefit from the other courses or not and take their decisions accordingly.
As a matter of fact, the purpose of taking the variety of courses can also benefit the student in their growing life as the extra knowledge they get can be implied in various other field. The way of thinking changes with the change in the field and also the subject. Student can benefit from this as their thinking skills develop and consequently there imagination power develops too. To clarify, lets consider the example, that a student taking a mechanical engineering courses, can choose some courses out of the field like the courses from electrical engineering or computer science, this would help the student to gain the extra knowledge and also the ability to utilize this extra knowledge in his initial field after passing out the college.
Whereas, in contradiction, if university made students to compulsory take the variety of courses in addition to their initial courses, may affect the particular student interested field performance. As will result due to his diversion of concentration from the main courses to other unintended course and the performance might not be as good as the student might actually give in his intended field courses.
In addition, failure in the other unintended field courses may discourage student and this would affect the interested field courses. This will obdurate his way toward the successfully completion of course and might lack his confidence. This would mislead the student in way towards the success. Whereas, consistent failure in course may cost student a lot, usually those who are dependent on someone else for their university fees.
In conclusion, universities should not require students to take the variety of courses outside their field as this would bring an obstacle to various students in completing their academics and would also lack the interest in completing academics.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-03 | sanketdhande | 54 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager."One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one 33
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition. 50
- Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time. 50
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the field 54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, thus, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, of course, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 19.5258426966 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2450.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 465.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2688172043 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72328041424 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.384946236559 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 750.6 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.2391343361 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.117647059 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3529411765 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52941176471 5.21951772744 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.497596998105 0.243740707755 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197898546691 0.0831039109588 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132269815103 0.0758088955206 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316019474387 0.150359130593 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115374791049 0.0667264976115 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.