In recent years, people move from village to towns for a better lifestyle. There are myriad of the reason for this movement rather than a better life. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of migration to cities from villages.
Firstly, there are many causes for the movement of people to urban areas such as better life facility and job availability in the urban areas. For instance, there are many international companies and industrial and manufacturing organizations are blossom daily in the urban areas because of the higher marketing chances and higher profit which makes the people rely on these organizations for their jobs and daily wages. So, people in the villages are moving to urban areas to reduce their travel distance to the workplaces, better job opportunities and lifestyle.
On the other hand, there are many consequences for these changes to the urban areas as it leads to overcrowding in the cities also leads to poor sanitary and poor quality of life. In addition, people may need to face higher expenses compared to the villages for their accommodation and travelling. For instance, people may need to take private vehicles in the cities due to the traffic issues and overcrowding the public services which can cause expensive life in urban areas.
In conclusion, urban life gives more pleasure and facilities to the people and helps to get all the things under one roof. In my opinion, for the better future prospects and lifestyle, people should think more about the problem to the atmosphere due to overpopulation, so these facilities should implement to the outskirts of the cities and can reduce many issues.
- These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time. Explain why you think this change has happened? What are the effects of this change in attitu 73
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 55
- Climate Change/Global Warming 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, so, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0989010989 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78679238735 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479853479853 0.580463131201 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1963034697 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.545454545 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.25397266985 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381369816385 0.242375264174 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153358389863 0.0925447433944 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759183615502 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222828785293 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591880581807 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.