Friends are an indispensable part of our lives without whom we are not complete human beings /we cannot live a full life/. In this regard, personally, I am prone to believe that it is more important to maintain friendships with the old friends than to be able to build new friendships easily. I hold this opinion since old friends are the best friends; and it is impossible to have many friends.
To begin with, the real friends are the ones who we know for a long time and on whom we may rely. There is a clear connection between the time period we know a person and the extent to which we trust them. This is explained by the fact that we need to get to know a person for a long time not to avoid asking them /him or her/ for help or assistance, and only /the/ old friends may meet these criteria. For example, I know my best friend for about 20 years, and this fact gives me confidence that he will never betray me or try to advise wrong things. This is the reason that I refer to him whenever I am in a trouble, or need advice and help. Thus, the longer and the better you know a person, the higher /are/ chances that you will make friendship with him /them/.
Additionally, no one has a lot of people nearby who might be treated as friends since building friendships is quite a complicated thing. People should have common interests, shared values, even common background to be able to maintain friendships. Therefore, it is logical to conclude that a lot of energy and devotion is needed from the both sides to become friends. My sister, for instance, makes new acquaintances easily thanks to her well-developed communicative skills. Overall, though, she has only three people close enough to be called friends. She explains this by the fact that friends are exclusive people who are not found in life easily. Consequently, the number of friends can never be large.
To sum up briefly, we can make acquaintances quite frequently, but building friendships is not a wide-spread thing. This and the fact that we cannot obtain plenty of friends determine the importance of maintaining the old friends.
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends. 60
- Eco certification and American wood companies (Integrated)Reading Section: In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological stan 80
- The reading passage suggests that the mentioned explorer indeed reached the Noth Pole in 1909. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that Peary's assertions are false. 76
- TPO 33: CARVED STONE BALLSReading:Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types 81
- TPO 41 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'advise' (a verb)?
Suggestion: advise
...him whenever I am in a trouble, or need advice and help. Thus, the longer and the bett...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, you know, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6100795756 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66833481679 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527851458886 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3755133744 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5555555556 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9444444444 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16182034567 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540435582804 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503416444701 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977208441679 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232330269868 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.