The percentage of tourists to England who visited 4 different attractions in Brighton
The graph illustrates the popularity of 4 different attractions to tourists who travel to England
Overall, it's clearly that Pier and Pavilion are the most favorite of all attractions in Brighton due to the increasing trend. Beside the promotion of Pier and Pavilion, Art Gallery with Festival are not really lucky while tourists didn't seem interested in these places
In the early stage, Pavilion and Pier didn't really well-known in Brighton with just only 25% for Pavilion, 10% for Pier in 1980. But some years later, visitors began to notice these places. Culminating in 1985 Pavilion officially surpassed Festival to reach the second place and got the highest number of 30% in 2010. Beside the development of Pavilion, Pier also concentrated a similar trend. In 2005, Art Gallery had the same destiny to Festival, gave way for Pier to reach the vertex of more than 20% in 2010
Art Gallery and Festival had more advantages in the first stage but there was no longer. The figures of Art Gallery had changed significantly from 37% in 1985 to 20% in 1990 and stopped at the lowest point about 10% in 2010. Festival seemed quite luckily than Art Gallery. At the end of the graph, Festival finally got 27% in 2010, only lower than Pavilion about 3%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugarsand sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in aEuropean country between 1979 and 2004. 84
- The percentage of tourists to England who visited 4 different attractions in Brighton 56
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited fourdifferent attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...rists who travel to England Overall, its clearly that Pier and Pavilion are the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...val are not really lucky while tourists didnt seem interested in these places In t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... In the early stage, Pavilion and Pier didnt really well-known in Brighton with just...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, really, second, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 1615.20841683 65% => OK
No of words: 215.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84651162791 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52022645286 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 506.74238477 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.9093026066 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.777777778 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109356036587 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453981649967 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111346192649 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135992760133 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169265585457 0.056905535591 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 78.4519038076 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.