The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
The pie graphs below compare the percentages of the population in three different age groups, in Yemen and Italy, in 2000 and 2050.
Overall, people in both countries are going to grow older in the next 50 years. Therefore, the age group 0-14 tends to decrease in the future.
By 2000, just over half of the population aged 0-14 in Yemen while this figure was 14.3% in Italy. Besides, people who aged 15-59 accounted for 46.3% and 61.6%, in Yemen and Italy, respectively. The group aged over 60 occupied 3.6% of the inhabitants of Yemen while this number in Italy was almost a quarter of the population.
By 2050, in Yemen, while people aged 15-59 are expected to grow rapidly from 46.3% to 57.3%, the children aged under 15 are anticipated to drop dramatically to 37%. In Italy, although the group aged 15-59 is predicted to decrease quickly to 46.2%, people aged over 60 tend to rise nearly double from 24,1% (2000).
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothersgo out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or anegative development? 61
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? 73
- Many university students live with their families, while others live awayfrom home because their universities are in different places. What are theadvantages and disadvantages of both situations? 56
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of thebuilding rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 758.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67901234568 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40271781287 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8700091269 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27596765451 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129093628672 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828456336032 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178456978614 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099064574202 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.